2015 Retreat Ideas: Difference between revisions

From iDigBio
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 20: Line 20:
** Keep iDigBio content and published articles separate
** Keep iDigBio content and published articles separate
* Get a Library Science grad student to help us with our document repository concerns (I asked Greg R. to look for someone: JM)
* Get a Library Science grad student to help us with our document repository concerns (I asked Greg R. to look for someone: JM)
* "Common knowledge" about the project
** Status of the portal and use
** Scope of data storage (ACIS)
** Role of postdocs and students in iDigBio — what they supposed to be doing?
** Citizen Science — is it in scope?
** K-12 initiatives
* The value of blitzes and hackathons

Revision as of 13:52, 10 November 2015

Ideas regarding the Retreat format

  • Breakout groups
  • One large discussion group
  • Presentations

Ideas for discussion topics at the Retreat

  • Share information from our meeting with NSF, including the new cooperative agreement and panel review summary
  • How to make our training sustainable
    • Converting our training materials for posterity/sustainability
    • Funding for participant support will be declining after 2017
    • Perhaps partner with Coursera
  • Website update and sustainability
  • Topics that come up at the Summit
  • Automation
  • Mendeley vs. Biblio
    • Improve discoverability
    • Keep iDigBio content and published articles separate
  • Get a Library Science grad student to help us with our document repository concerns (I asked Greg R. to look for someone: JM)
  • "Common knowledge" about the project
    • Status of the portal and use
    • Scope of data storage (ACIS)
    • Role of postdocs and students in iDigBio — what they supposed to be doing?
    • Citizen Science — is it in scope?
    • K-12 initiatives
  • The value of blitzes and hackathons