Talk:IDigBio Retreat 2015: Difference between revisions
		
		
		
		
		
		Jump to navigation
		Jump to search
		
				
		
		
	
No edit summary  | 
				Austinmast (talk | contribs)   | 
				||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
* Annotations workflows - Analyzing the needs, expectations and desires of submitters, curators, and observers around the collection and presentation of annotations.  | * Annotations workflows - Analyzing the needs, expectations and desires of submitters, curators, and observers around the collection and presentation of annotations.  | ||
* Issue certificates to collections that participate in ADBC, perhaps meeting some quota set by iDigBio.  | * Issue certificates to collections that participate in ADBC, perhaps meeting some quota set by iDigBio.  | ||
*The new iDigBio Outlier Detection and Documentation by Collectors (or the ODD Collectors) Working Group (Austin and Katie S)  | |||
*New directions for the Libraries of Life Augmented Reality app and cards; sustainability of them (Austin)  | |||
*New directions for WeDigBio and its sustainability (Austin and Libby)  | |||
Revision as of 14:52, 17 November 2015
Ideas regarding the Retreat format
- Breakout groups
 - One large discussion group
 - Presentations
 
Ideas for discussion topics at the Retreat
- Share information from our meeting with NSF, including the new cooperative agreement and panel review summary
 - Everyone watch this video together (DP, KL, MC)
- Data training programmes in large natural history museums to tackle their digital challenges Dimitris Koureas & Clare Valentine, NHM
 
 - How to make our training sustainable
- Converting our training materials for posterity/sustainability
- Perhaps partner with Coursera (or a firm like them)
 
 - Funding for participant support will be declining after 2017
 
 - Converting our training materials for posterity/sustainability
 - Tools Knowledge in the Community
- Developing a strategy for sharing what tools are out there
- Example: Biovel
 
 
 - Developing a strategy for sharing what tools are out there
 - Sharing information about skills researchers need to use particular tools
- Could get lots of info from iPlant and Data Carpentry about the skills problems people run into when trying to use any of the community tools for research.
- Use this to strategically point people to where they can transform their data, or learn a skill.
 
 - NOTE: skills needed are mostly the same across the data providers and researchers based on the experience of COLLAB-IT, Data and Software Carpentry.
 
 - Could get lots of info from iPlant and Data Carpentry about the skills problems people run into when trying to use any of the community tools for research.
 - Website update and sustainability
- Increase role of community in maintaining content -> larger role for Wiki; lesser role for Drupal
 - Content organization/re-organization
 - Facelift? (In consultation with Jeremy - he is against this.: JM)
 
 - Sustainability issues for iDigBio + TCNs
- Historical Knowledge and Documents
- Do TCNs have robust plans for sharing developed workflows / protocols / policies (on digitization, imaging, archiving, communication strategies,...)
 - Do they archive plans for these documents?
- Can we provide this?
 
 - TCN Staff (at high, middle, and in-the-trenches) are amassing a wealth of knowledge about digitization. When their funding ends, a great deal of this may be lost.
- How do we include these TCNs in future summits?
 - Is there a role for some Video Exit Interviews (oral interviews), to capture this knowledge? Perhaps Shari and Betty could set something up?
 
 
 
 - Historical Knowledge and Documents
 - Topics that come up at the Summit:
- Day 1 Discussion Group Summaries
 - Day 2 Discussion Group Summaries
 - Suggestion for Summit VI: emphasize use of the data in research and E&O; less on progress at the TCNs
 
 - Automation
 - Mendeley vs. Biblio
- Improve discoverability
 - Keep iDigBio content and published articles separate
 
 - Get a Library Science grad student to help us with our document repository concerns (I asked Greg R. to look for someone: JM)
 - "Common knowledge" about the project
- Status of the portal and use
 - Scope of data storage (ACIS)
 - Role of postdocs and students in iDigBio — what are they supposed to be doing?
 - Citizen Science
 - K-12 initiatives
 
 - The value of blitzes and hackathons
 - Annotations workflows - Analyzing the needs, expectations and desires of submitters, curators, and observers around the collection and presentation of annotations.
 - Issue certificates to collections that participate in ADBC, perhaps meeting some quota set by iDigBio.
 - The new iDigBio Outlier Detection and Documentation by Collectors (or the ODD Collectors) Working Group (Austin and Katie S)
 - New directions for the Libraries of Life Augmented Reality app and cards; sustainability of them (Austin)
 - New directions for WeDigBio and its sustainability (Austin and Libby)