Talk:Object To Image To Data Workshop

From iDigBio
Revision as of 11:52, 9 March 2012 by Gnelson (talk | contribs) (Are workflows other than object-image-data really "nor preferred?")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Regarding the statement in our workshop intro: "The planning committee also recognizes that some institutions may follow a workflow that proceeds from object to data to image; while this approach is not preferred, it will be addressed to some degree during the Workshop."

I think we should qualify the phrase "not preferred" to suggest that our workshop does not focus on object-data-image workflows. Preference is not the issue. Stating that workflows other than object-image-data are "not preferred" is not universally accurate. There are collections, especially in entomology, that do not intend to image every specimen. In some cases the specimens to be imaged might be a small percentage of the total collection. In these situations, doing data entry first is logical, and decisions about which specimens to image may actually occur at the time of data entry.